CSI Simulation: Why Additive Noise Fails and How to Fix It
A. Bouferroum, I. Alla, V. Lenders, V. Loscri
Preprint (HAL) · 2026 Under Review
CSI-based Wi-Fi sensing models are often trained on data simulated by adding noise, but that assumption breaks inside the receiver…
Channel State Information (CSI) is a widely used Wi-Fi sensing modality, and models are commonly trained on data simulated by adding noise (most often additive white Gaussian noise) to recorded channel estimates. Testing this assumption on six commodity receivers across two indoor environments, we show it does not hold: automatic gain control compresses the channel estimate multiplicatively, producing amplitude distributions that no additive noise variance can reproduce. We propose MQTC, a measurement-calibrated model combining per-subcarrier quantile mapping, temporal filtering, and copula-based cross-subcarrier reordering, which reduces amplitude error 8-fold and closes 89% of the aggregate fidelity gap. Classifiers trained on MQTC-simulated data recover 93% of real-data jamming-detection performance, while AWGN-trained classifiers remain near random.
@misc{bouferroum2026csisimulationadditivenoise,
title={CSI Simulation: Why Additive Noise Fails and How to Fix It},
author={Aymen Bouferroum and Ildi Alla and Vincent Lenders and Valeria Loscri},
year={2026},
eprint={2607.01882},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.NI},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01882},
}